§ 65. Mr. McGOVERNasked the Minister of Labour how many persons registered at Parkhead Employment Exchange were admitted to benefit as a result of the abolition of the not-genuinely-seeking-work condition; and how many of these have since been refused benefit as not normally engaged in insurable employment?
§ Mr. LAWSONI regret that statistics giving the information desired are not available.
§ Mr. McGOVERNCan the hon. Gentleman say when the information will be available?
§ Mr. LAWSONIt is not possible to get this information explicitly, because the figures are naturally bound up with the ordinary registration figures.
§ Mr. BECKETTIs it not the fact that we used to be able to get the number of those who were refused benefit on the ground that they were not genuinely seeking work; and why cannot we get the figures for the total number disqualified under the present arrangement?
§ Mr. LAWSONThis question is much more complicated than that.
§ Mr. STEPHENIs it not the case that all the Employment Exchanges have full lists of the names of individuals, and, in view of the importance of this matter, does not my hon. Friend think that some of the Exchanges should have these facts at hand?
§ Mr. LAWSONI have made a very close inquiry into this matter, and I am sure that it is not possible to get these figures. Of course, an estimate could be made, but it could only be done in a very general way.
§ Mr. BUCHANANCould not the Parliamentary Secretary at least tell the hon. Member for Shettleston (Mr. McGovern) the number of those who have been refused benefit at the Parkhead Exchange since the passing of the new Act on the ground of not being normally in insurable employment?
§ Mr. LAWSONThat could not be done for the simple reason that what the hon. Member asks for is the number of those originally accepted under the new Act who have since been refused benefit. That is not possible.
§ Mr. McGOVERNI suppose it is not desirable.
§ Mr. ERNEST BROWNIs it not the case that, if this question cannot be answered simply because six months ago scarcely any were refused benefit on the ground of not being normally in insurable employment, all that the hon. Gentleman needs to do is to give the figure that he knows?
§ Mr. LAWSONIt is possible to get the number of those who were refused benefit under the Act generally, but it is not possible to get the number refused out of those who were accepted under the new Act.
§ Mr. BECKETTIs it not the fact that this condition has been abused in exactly the same way as the old one?
§ Mr. LAWSONNo; that is not so.
§ Mr. McGOVERNIt is so.