§ 8. Mr. THURTLEasked the Secretary of "State for India whether he will urge the Government of India to accord to Mr. Subhas C. Bose and the 11 others recently convicted with him treatment as political prisoners, in view of the fact that their offence was purely political in character?
§ Mr. BENNDiscussions are now in progress as to the rules relating to "special class" prisoners and connected matters. Meanwhile, the treatment to be accorded to individual prisoners must be left to the discretion of the proper authorities in India.
§ Mr. THURTLEIs any distinction made m India as far as political prisoners are concerned? Are they treated differently from other prisoners?
§ Mr. BENNThe term used is "special class" prisoners. I can only tell my hon. Friend that discussions in relation to the treatment of special class prisoners have been proceeding, and are proceeding at this moment.
§ Brigadier-General CLIFTON BROWNWere not the remarks in question seditious rather than political?
§ Mr. BENNThis case is still sub judice, and I do not feel qualified, nor should I think it proper, to make any observations on it.
Earl WINTERTONIs it not the case that Mr. Bose has been convicted; and, therefore, when the right hon. Gentleman speaks of the case being sub judice, does he mean that Mr. Bose is appealing?
§ 9. Mr. THURTLEasked the Secretary of State for India the inscriptions or slogans on the banners to which exception 6 was taken in the case of Mr. Subhas C. Bose and others, and which led to the prosecution and conviction of these men?
§ Mr. BENNUntil I receive the judgment in this case, I am not in a position to affirm or deny my hon. Friend's assumption that their conviction was based on inscriptions on banners, and I do not know the exact terms of these inscriptions.
§ Mr. THURTLEWill my right hon. Friend be good enough, for the information of the House, to get the text of these inscriptions?
Earl WINTERTONIs not this part of the same case which is at present sub judice? The right hon. Gentleman, doubtless, will make no statement until after the appeal?