§ 22. Mr. McKINLAYasked the Secretary of State for War under what regulation the appointment of Mr. James McKechnie as deputy-lieutenant of the county of Stirling was rejected; if such appointment was approved by the lord lieutenant of the county and the Secretary of State for Scotland; and what steps he proposes to take to alter the procedure?
§ Mr. SHAWDeputy-lieutenants are appointed under the Militia Act, 1882, and the Deputy Lieutenants Act, 1918. Under the latter Act, a candidate must be shown to the satisfaction of a Secre 2706 tary of State to have rendered worthy service as a, member of, or in a civil capacity in connection with, His Majesty's Naval, Military or Air Forces. As the appointment is a military one, approval is naturally given through the Secretary of State for War. As regards Mr. McKechnie's case, Mr. McKechnie has given no service in a civil capacity in connection with His Majesty's Forces and his military service fell far short of the period which is regarded as qualifying on that ground. I very much regret that I was therefore unable to regard Mr. McKechnie as qualified for appointment. As regards the last part of the question I see no grounds for altering the existing procedure.
§ Mr. MACQUISTENHas he ever been a member of a Cadet Corps?
§ Mr. McKINLAYIs it not the case that similar appointments have been made purely on political grounds in the past? [HON. MEMBERS: "Never!"] In view of the seriousness of this question, so far as the working classes are concerned, I beg to give notice that I shall raise the matter on the Adjournment.
§ Sir N. GRATTAN-DOYLEIs it not the fact that the appointment of deputy-lieutenants is a prerogative of the Crown?
§ Mr. MACPHERSONAs the hon. Member who introduced the Bill in 1918, may I ask whether it is not the fact that if a candidate for a deputy-lieutenancy has rendered any military service at all it lies within the discretion of the Secretary of State for War to appoint him or not?
§ Mr. SHAWWhen this matter was before me, I naturally, this man being a working man, took a very lively interest in the case. [HON. MEMBERS: "Why?"] Because I want to see working men represented throughout. The facts are that a consistent policy has been followed. A list of names was shown me of people who had not been appointed with much longer service, and I could not in common decency make an appointment which was contrary to practice.