HC Deb 02 April 1930 vol 237 cc1276-7
58. Mr. GRANVILLE GIBSON

asked the First Commissioner of Works if, in view of the fact that Government property is not covered by insurance, he will carefully consider the desirability of installing with sprinklers Government art galleries and museums containing treasures impossible of replenishment in the event of loss by fire?

Mr. LANSBURY

The installation of sprinkler systems in Government art galleries and museums generally involves the risk of serious damage by water to large sections of the collections in the event of the system being brought into operation. The policy at present followed of building in fire-resisting materials, eliminating potential fire-risks wherever possible, and maintaining systematic fire patrols has been definitely adopted as providing adequate safeguards, but sprinkler systems have been installed in the basements and store-rooms of certain museums where there is no direct risk of damage by water to exhibits.

Mr. GIBSON

While appreciating all that has been done, as outlined by the right hon. Gentleman, may I ask if he is aware that there are both dry and wet sprinkler systems, and that if the dry sprinklers are installed there is no danger of flooding by water?

Mr. LANSBURY

I am not aware of that fact, but I am aware that the system in vogue appears to be a very efficient one, and the best possible that is available at the present time.