§ 37. Mr. DAYasked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he was consulted before notice was served on the promoters of the Glasgow Stock Exchange Derby sweepstake that it was illegal; and what instructions he issued?
§ Sir J. GILMOURThe answer to the first part of the question is in the negative. I have issued no instructions on the matter as it does not fall within my jurisdiction. The action taken by the responsible authority is, I understand, in accordance with the ordinary law and practice in Scotland.
§ Mr. DAYIs the Secretary of State not aware that this is practically the same sort of sweepstake as is being allowed in London, and if there is no difference in principle between them, will the right hon. Gentleman say why Scotland and the Glasgow Stock Exchange should be treated differently from the London Stock Exchange?
§ Sir J. GILMOURI am advised that lotteries which includes sweepstakes are illegal both by common law and by Statute law. The Lord Advocate is the responsible authority for criminal prosecutions in Scotland.
§ Mr. HAYESIs there not some arrangement between His Majesty's inspectors in Scotland and the Home Office to harmonise the various arrangements under which this law relating to lotteries is operated?
§ Sir J. GILMOURThere is no arrangement such as the one suggested to alter the effect of the existing law.
§ Mr. HAYESIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that the law operating in 2328 Scotland with reference to sweepstakes is identical with the law operating in England?
§ Mr. DAYIs the right hon. Gentleman the last authority in this matter? As the London Stock Exchange sweepstake is allowed, will he consider allowing the Glasgow sweepstake to proceed?
§ Sir J. GILMOURNo, Sir. I have already stated that I have no jurisdiction in the matter at all, and the question is one for the Law Officers of the Crown.