HC Deb 23 May 1928 vol 217 cc1880-1
62. Mr. T. WILLIAMS

asked the President of the Board of Trade the number and value of abrasive wheels (used for hand grinding) that were imported into this country from Germany and America respectively, for the years 1926 and 1927?

Mr. H. WILLIAMS

The answer takes the form of a table of figures, and if the hon. Member will allow me, I will circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

Following is the answer:

evidence on these applications is more in the nature of casual conversation than anything else?

Mr. WILLIAMS

I understand that as a rule both sides are represented by counsel, and I am certain that the way they conduct their work would meet with my hon. Friend's approval.

Mr. HANNON

Would it not be better to have a single tribunal, instead of individual tribunals, so that continuity of policy might be established?

Mr. DIXEY

Will the hon. Gentleman consider a change in the procedure?

Mr. WILLIAMS

It has already been stated in the House that it is not the intention of His Majesty's Government to make any change in the White Paper during the lifetime of the present Parliament.

65. Mr. RYE

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he will consider the advisability of altering the constitution of the committees to be set up to deal with applications for safeguarding, so as to ensure that future applications are dealt with by a member of the Bar or some other person of standing having judicial experience?

Mr. WILLIAMS

My right hon. Friend does not consider that he should bind himself as to the selection of members of the committees in the manner suggested.

Mr. RYE

Is my hon. Friend aware that these inquiries are intended to be of a semi-judicial nature, and that they frequently are not?

Mr. WILLIAMS

It is because of their semi-judicial character that I gave the answer which I gave to the previous question, namely, that the Board of Trade will not interfere with the procedure.

Mr. RYE

Is not the reason that the persons appointed on the committee have had no judicial training and are, therefore, unable to weigh the value of evidence?

Mr. SPEAKER

Hon. Members are giving their own opinions.