HC Deb 19 June 1928 vol 218 cc1584-5
13. Mr. LUNN (for Mr. DAVID GRENFELL)

asked the Secretary for Mines whether he is in possession of the latest ascertainment in the coal industry; and whether he can give the particulars relative to the wages cost per ton, costs other than wages, and the pit-head price per ton of coal in the several districts?

Commodore KING

I assume the hon. Member refers to the quarterly statistical summary issued by the Mines Department. As soon as it was announced that the Mines Department's Estimates would be discussed on Thursday, I made arrangements specially to expedite the publication of the summary for the March quarter. It is not possible to publish it before Wednesday evening, but for the convenience of hon. Members several proof copies have been placed in the Library.

14. Mr. LUNN (for Mr. D. GRENFELL)

asked the Secretary for Mines the figures showing the deficits in the ascertainment results which have accrued since the system was adopted in 1921, giving figures for each coalfield separately?

Commodore KING

Deficiencies which accumulated under the national agreements of 1921 and 1924 terminated with the ending of those agreements. I have figures showing the deficiencies under the present district agreements up to April last for most of the principal districts, and these I will circulate in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

Mr. T. WILLIAMS

Can the right hon. Gentleman give us the total in all these districts?

Commodore KING

I cannot do that without notice.

Following are the figures:

£
Scotland 3,390,678
Northumberland 1,276,949
Durham 3,835,926
South Wales and Monmouth 6,655,774
Yorkshire 4,541,658
Nottinghamshire 991,725
North Derby 1,142,107
Lancs. and Cheshire 1,489,020
North Wales 958,288
Cumberland 430,811

Forward to