HC Deb 04 December 1928 vol 223 cc1023-5
82. Mr. SHINWELL

asked the Minister of Labour the circumstances in which visits are made at the homes of unemployed persons by officers of the Bathgate Exchange; and whether this is done for the purpose of obtaining information in respect of claims or with a view to ascertaining whether the unemployed person is seeking work?

The PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY to the MINISTRY of LABOUR (Mr. Betterton)

No, Sir. I could not state the circumstances of these visits otherwise than by saying generally that they are needed for verifying that the conditions for the receipt of benefit are satisfied.

Mr. SHINWELL

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that many unemployed persons resent these officers putting what they believe to be unnecessary interrogations; and will he not put a stop to or, at all events, modify this objectionable practice?

Mr. BETTERTON

The hon. Member is under a misapprehension. It is the duty of these investigators to find out the facts, and quite often these investigations are in the interests of the applicants themselves.

Mr. KELLY

Does the Ministry expect people to be at home, when at the same time they require the same people to go round from gate to gate looking for work?

Mr. BETTERTON

It is exactly in order to ascertain that they are not at home and that they are looking for work that the inquiries are made.

84. Mr. KELLY

asked the Minister of Labour why there is delay amounting to weeks in the payment of unemployment insurance benefit at the Gloucester Exchange; and how many officers at the Gloucester Exchange are engaged in visiting the homes of applicants for benefit to investigate the claims?

Mr. BETTERTON

I am not aware that there is any general delay in paying unemployment benefit at the Gloucester Exchange, but I shall be glad to have inquiries made into any individual cases if the hon. Member cares to give details. There is one officer engaged on investigation work, which occasionally involves a visit to an applicant's home.

Mr. KELLY

For what purpose is this officer detailed for such work, when there is so much other work in the Exchange itself?

Mr. STEPHEN

Have these investigating officers been trained at Scotland Yard?

Mr. BETTERTON

The answer to the first supplementary question is the same as that which I gave a moment ago. In the case which I think the hon. Member for Rochdale (Mr. Kelly) has in mind, and about which he wrote to me, there were very special circumstances which I shall be glad to discuss with him, but which I would rather not state in the House.

Forward to