§ 40. Mr. LUNNasked the Secretary for Mines if he is aware that three men lost their lives as the result of an explosion 355 at the Temple Pit, Waterloo Main Colliery, Leeds, on Friday last; and whether he proposes to set up a Government inquiry into the causes of the explosion?
§ Commodore KINGThe answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. With regard to the second part, the investigations which are being carried out by His Majesty's inspectors have not yet been completed; but the case does not at present appear to be one in which a public inquiry will be necessary in addition to the Coroner's Inquest.
§ Mr. LUNNIs that the report from His Majesty's inspector; and has the hon. and gallant Gentleman given consideration to the evidence at the inquest by the widows of the men who lost their lives in this unfortunate disaster? May I put down this Question again for Tuesday next, so that the hon. and gallant Gentleman may have further time to consider it, before giving a definite reply as to whether an inquiry shall be held or not?
§ Commodore KINGI shall be pleased to give the information as soon as I have it. As I have said in my answer, the investigations of the inspector are not yet completed. When they are completed the adjourned inquest will take place. It has been adjourned until the inspector's report can be considered, and I do not think that, when the inquest is over, there will be need for an inquiry.
§ Mr. LUNNI asked the hon. and gallant Gentleman had he considered, or would he consider, the evidence given at the inquest by the widows of these men. In view of that evidence, does he not think that an inquiry is necessary? At all events, may I put down the Question for Tuesday next so that he may have further time to consider the matter?
§ Commodore KINGOh, yes.