HC Deb 14 February 1927 vol 202 cc552-3
51. Mr. R. SMITH

asked the Prime Minister whether he can make a statement to the House with regard to the invitation from President Coolidge, in connection with the forthcoming disarmament conference of the League of Nations, to consider a proposal for naval disarmament in all categories, as a further development of the Washington Conference Agreement?

52. Captain GARRO-JONES

asked the Prime Minister whether the Government intends to acquiesce in the proposal of the United States Government that the forthcoming Preparatory Commission on Disarmament should be turned into a plenary body authorised to conclude a treaty?

The PRIME MINISTER

A proposal of the nature indicated has been received from the United States Government and is receiving most earnest consideration. It is too early to make a statement.

Mr. R. SMITH

Whatever the developments may be with regard to considering this Matter in the course of 1927, in view of the fact that a very great deal of pressure is being brought to bear on the American side to induce President Coolidge to embark upon increases in cruiser construction, based mainly upon our own increases, will the right hon. Gentleman not consider restricting cruiser construction in the Estimates this year?

The PRIME MINISTER

The whole point is under consideration.

Vice-Admiral Sir REGINALD HALL

Are the proposals from America confined to a reduction of naval armaments?

The PRIME MINISTER

I think that is so.

Captain GARRO-JONES

Has the right hon. Gentleman not considered how much more valuable than a tardy reply would be a prompt and whole-hearted acquiescence in the proposals.

The PRIME MINISTER

The hon. and gallant Member does not realise that the communication was received only last Thursday night. There are many considerations in fact which have to be borne in mind, and over which we have not complete control.

Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY

Before a reply is sent, will the right hon. Gentleman give the House an opportunity of expressing its opinion?

The PRIME MINISTER

I think the general expression of opinion in the House would be in favour of embracing every favourable opportunity for consideration of the matter.

Captain GARRO-JONES

What possible reason could there be against accepting a proposal to confer with a view to reducing armaments?

Mr. SPEAKER

Order, order!