HC Deb 27 July 1926 vol 198 cc1902-3
45. Mr. SEXTON

asked the Prime Minister if he is aware that communications have been sent to Labour magistrates from the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster asking for an explanation as to their conduct as trade union officials and representatives during the general strike; and if, in view of the fact that there is no representative of the Duchy of Lancaster in this House, he will state why this action was taken?

Mr. DAVIDSON (for The CHANCELLOR of the DUCHY of LANCASTER)

My Noble Friend has in certain cases sent communications to magistrates about whom he has received allegations that in connection with the general strike they committed breaches of the law or took action incompatible with their position as magistrates. It is only right when such allegations are made to give the gentlemen concerned an opportunity of replying to them.

Mr. SEXTON

In what way have they committed a breach of the law in exercising their functions as trade union secretaries; and in what way does that conflict with their duty as magistrates?

Mr. DAVIDSON

When their replies have been received, they will be considered.

Mr. SEXTON

Will the hon. Gentleman point out where the breach of the law has been committed, and what particular law has been broken by these men acting in a purely trade union manner and as the representatives of trade unions?

Mr. DAVIDSON

A breach of the law has not yet been established.

Lord APSLEY

Is it right to use the expression "Labour magistrates," since all magistrates are supposed to act irrespective of party?

Mr. BUCHANAN

How does the hon. Gentleman account for the differentiation between the General Council and these men, if these men are to be disqualified from holding such positions, while the members of the General Council, on whose instructions they were acting, are invited to a garden party as leading guests of the State?

Mr. DAVIDSON

There is no decision that these gentlemen must be disqualified.

Mr. BUCHANAN

As they are likely to be disqualified, can the hon. Gentlemen account for the differentiation which deprives them of their positions, and includes the members of the General Council among the guests of the highest in the land?

Mr. DAVIDSON

The hon. Member is putting a purely hypothetical question.

Mr. J. HUDSON

What prima facie evidence was there, that there had been any breach of the law when inquiries were first instituted?

Mr. TREVELYAN

Were any charges brought against these men?

Mr. DAVIDSON

I understand that allegations have been made—[HON. MEMBERS: "By whom?"]—and when allegations are made it is right that there should be an opportunity of reply.

Mr. TREVELYAN

Were any charges made in the law courts?

Mr. HUDSON

By whom were the allegations made?

Mr. DAVIDSON

I should want notice of that question.

Mr. BUCHANAN

If I am in order, I intend to take the first opportunity of raising this matter.