HC Deb 17 February 1926 vol 191 cc1907-8
18. Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether naval economies being effected will include the abolition of the Admiralty yacht "Enchantress" and other yachts?

Mr. DAVIDSON

The only yachts now in existence in the Royal Navy are the Royal yacht "Victoria and Albert" and the Admiralty yacht "Enchantress" There is no question of abolishing either of these vessels.

Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY

Is the "Enchantress" necessary for the fighting efficiency of the Navy?

Mr. DAVIDSON

No, but it is very useful otherwise.

Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY

When we are economising on the seagoing practice of the Service, is it right to keep this luxury vessel?

Mr. DAVIDSON

It does not cost anything.

Mr. KIRKWOOD

That is not the case. The hon. Member says the "Enchantress" costs nothing. That is not true. We have had that question up before.

Mr. SPEAKER

It is not my duty to be censor of Minister's statements.

Colonel WEDGWOOD

Is it by some miracle that the "Enchantress" costs nothing?

Mr. DAVIDSON

She is laid up, and has been laid up?

Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY

The hon. Member has given an obviously inaccurate answer, no doubt in error. A vessel, even when laid up, has to have care and maintenance. She has to have her engines kept in repair. How can the hon. Gentleman say that it costs nothing?

Mr. DAVIDSON

I meant relatively.

Mr. KIRKWOOD

It was a "moutho graphical" error.