HC Deb 11 May 1925 vol 183 cc1444-5
69. Commander BELLAIRS

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether cotton treated with chemicals and mercerised cottons are to be classed as artificial silk for the purpose of taxation?

Mr. GUINNESS

We propose to tax the article which is known commercially as artificial silk. Mercerised cotton will not, therefore, be taxed, nor will cotton fibre unless converted into artificial silk

Commander BELLAIRS

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that some articles are not known as artificial silk? The product of the British Celanese Company is not known as artificial silk and is never described as artificial silk, but is chemically treated cotton?

Mr. GUINNESS

That matter will, no doubt, be discussed this afternoon, and I think that will be a more suitable occasion to deal with the point

Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY

If the trade changes the name of this product, what will the right hon. Gentleman do then?

Mr. GUINNESS

Oh, changing the name of the product would no more affect its liability to duty than changing the name of sugar or tobacco

Major HOREBELISHA

Will the right hon. Gentleman vouchsafe a definition of what artificial silk is?

Mr. GUINNESS

That had better be left to the Debate this afternoon

70. Commander BELLAIRS

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much of the anticipated revenue of £1,500,000 from the artificial silk tax this year is from Customs and how much from Excise, respectively, and how much in the full year out of the £2,500,000 anticipated?

Mr. GUINNESS

The figures are as follow:

Estimated Revenue
1925–26 Full year
£ £
Customs 600,000 1,000,000
Excise 900,000 1,500,000
1,500,000 2,500,000
Forward to