HC Deb 15 July 1925 vol 186 cc1277-8
55. Sir CLEMENT KINLOCH-COOKE

asked the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, as representing the First Commissioner of Works, whether, seeing that Nigeria and South Africa produce goat skins equal, if not superior, to any foreign goat skins, he can say why Nigerian and South African skins were refused and foreign skins preferred when the tenders were accepted for covering the seats in the House of Commons?

Mr. G. LOCKER-LAMPSON (for

The successful tenderer for the work of recovering the seats in this House used European skins, as being most satisfactory for the grade of work required, having regard to the wear and tear to which the seats in the House are subjected and to the comfort of Members during the long sittings. The First Commissioner realises, however, the desirability of encouraging Empire produce, and is making exhaustive inquiries into the whole question with a view to using Empire skins as far as possible.

Sir C. KINLOCH-COOKE

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that the Conservative Office, at the present moment, is issuing a circular asking that we should buy British goods? May I also ask the hon. Member if he is aware that in my house I have purchased Empire skins, and I have sat upon them for 20 years, and they are still as good as they were then?

Colonel DAY

Will the hon. Gentleman say if it is a fact that foreign skins are purchased because they are much cheaper?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

No. On the occasion these foreign skins were purchased, the expert opinion was that they were more durable for the purpose.

Mr. RILE.Y

Is it not a fact that Nigerian skins are not only cheaper but they are more durable?

Major CRAWFURD

Has the hon. Gentleman ever heard of Welsh goats?