HC Deb 19 May 1924 vol 173 c1838

  1. 1. That no corrupt practice was committed by or with the knowledge or consent of the Respondent at the said election.
  2. 2. That the said Respondent was guilty by his election agent of the corrupt practice of having knowingly made the declaration respecting election expenses required by Section 33 of The Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act, 1883, falsely.
  3. 3. That James Charles Johnstone, the Respondent's election agent, was proved to have been guilty of the corrupt practice of having as election agent for the Respondent knowingly made the declaration respecting election expenses required by Section 33 of The Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act, 1883, falsely.