HC Deb 04 June 1924 vol 174 c1230
22. Viscount CURZON

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty what will be the destroyer strength of the British, American, and Japanese Navies in 1919; and what the position is to-day, eliminating in each case destroyers considered to be worn out or obsolete?

Mr. AMMON

On the basis that the useful life of a destroyer is 12 years, and that in the case of British destroyers one year's war service is equal to two years' peace service, the destroyer strengths on the 4th June, 1924, are

British Empire 197
United States of America 279
Japan 74
On the assumption that existing programmes authorised and projected will be completed, and taking no account of possible future programmes, the destroyer strengths on the 1st April, 1929, will be
British Empire 119
United States of America 262
Japan 82

Captain WEDGWOOD BENN

Is the formula of one year's war service equalling years' peace service applied to the strengths of all countries named in the hon. Gentleman's reply?

Mr. AMMON

The answer I gave was as far as the British Empire was concerned. We are unable to answer for other countries.

Captain BENN

What is the value of the comparison if you have artificial standards for British ships?

Mr. AMMON

The value of the comparison must be quite simple, if the hon. and gallant Gentleman will give it a moment's reflection. No other Navy did the same service as our Navy during the War.

Mr. HOPE SIMPSON

Did not the American Navy do any service?

Mr. AMMON

Not the same amount of comparable service.

Forward to