§ 8. Mr. J. HARRISasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty whether it is proposed to entertain the guests on the "Enchantress" entirely at Government expense?
§ Mr. HODGESThe arrangements in this respect will be the same in the case of the guests accommodated in the "Enchantress" as in the case of the guests accommodated in the other vessels.
§ 16. Mr. HARRISalso asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty if he will state what is the total number of vessels other than the "Enchantress" which it is proposed to employ for the transit and entertainment of visitors to the naval review; and what is the total estimated cost to the taxpayer, including that of the "Enchantress," of entertaining the guests and visitors during the review?
§ Mr. HODGESIn addition to the "Enchantress" it is proposed to employ four vessels for the transit and entertainment of visitors to the naval review, and 1301 the total estimated cost of their entertainment, including that on the "Enchantress," is £1,500. It is also proposed to permit a limited number of Admiralty and dockyard officials and their friends to view the assembed Fleet, at their own expense.
§ Viscount CURZONWould it not be possible for Members of Parliament and their friends to go on board these ships at their own expense?
§ Mr. HODGESUnder the terms already indicated in the notice.
§ Mr. HARRISDoes the £1,500 include the cost of reconditioning the vessel?
§ Mr. HODGESNo. That is £1,100. The figures represented here are for entertainment.
§ Mr. SULLIVANDoes not the hon. Gentleman consider that it is carrying economy to the point of meanness not to allow us to see these warships?
§ Mr. HOGGEIs there any reason why Members of this House at intervals of three years at a small cost like that should not visit and be interested in the Navy?
§ 18. Mr. HOGGEasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty why accommodation for a limited number of Members only is to be provided for the purpose of witnessing the naval review; and whether, in view of the importance of the occasion and the desirability of all Members who so wish seeing the Fleet, he will provide facilities for this?
§ Mr. HODGESI regret that the number and size of the Admiralty vessels which are available and suitable for taking distinguished visitors to the review, and the restricted amount allowed for purposes of entertainment, do not make it possible to invite all Members of Parliament. To accommodate all Members, one or more passenger ships would have to be, specially chartered, as on the occasion of previous reviews—[HON. MEMBERS: "Why not?"]—and the cost involved would be greater than His Majesty's Government has felt justified in incurring.
§ Mr. HOGGEIs not every hon. Member of this House entitled, ipso facto, to attend this review, is it not a fact that he is asked to pay the covering expenses, 1302 is it not also a fact that on previous occasions every other Government has arranged a vessel of a sufficient size to accommodate all Members, and is it not finally a fact that Members who have been on these reviews on former occasions have come back much mare interested in and knowing a great deal more about the Navy than before?
§ Mr. W. THORNEIs the hon. Gentleman aware that at the last review the Government of that day adopted the Socialist principles of giving a free ride and free food?
§ Mr. HODGESWe are aware of all the facts referred to. They are not disputed for one moment. No one would be more pleased to see all the Members of Parliament at this review than myself, but at the same time there are the financial limits imposed, which the Admiralty are called upon to observe.
§ Mr. LOVERSEEDWill new Members receive priority? [HON. MEMBERS: "Oh!"]
§ Mr. HODGESThat matter has still to be decided.
§ Colonel GRETTONTo what Vote will these expenses be charged? Will they come out of the Entertainment Fund?
§ Mr. HODGESIn the main, yes.
§ Viscount CURZONIn the event of it not being possible to detail a flotilla leader to get under weigh with Members of Parliament on board, will it be possible for Members of Parliament to go on board ships that are taking part in the review, travelling at their own expense?
§ Mr. HODGESThat is a question which I will see is put in the proper quarter.
§ Lieut.-Colonel HOWARD-BURYWill those Members have priority who voted for the five cruisers?
§ Mr. B. SMITHIn view of the anxiety of all Members to take part in the naval review, can the hon. Gentleman arrange that Members should travel at their own expense, so that they may have the advantage of visiting the Fleet?
§ Sir H. BRITTAINIs it not a fact that the British Government——
§ Mr. SPEAKERFurther questions must be put on the Paper.