HC Deb 12 February 1924 vol 169 cc743-4
Lieut.-Commander KENWORTHY

think it would be convenient if we could be told what is to be the course of business to-day. It has been stated that there is to be a Motion for the Adjournment of the Debate and it would be convenient if we were informed what is proposed.

The PRIME MINISTER

In that matter I am quite in the hands of the House. I anticipate that to-day, to-morrow, and the next day will be taken up with this Debate, but it has been communicated to me through the usual channels that there might be a desire, after I have finished what I have to say this afternoon, for an Adjournment. [HON. MEMBERS: "Why?"] It has been communicated to me through the usual channels. I am not concerned one way or the other. If it be for the convenience of the House, I am perfectly ready to agree, but, if hon. Members wish to carry on the Debate, I do not see why we should not do so.

Mr. BALDWIN

We have had no information as to the nature of the right hon. Gentleman's speech or the length of it, and I think we must await fuller know- ledge. If the speech were one of considerable length covering a large variety of subjects, it might be for the general convenience of the House to adjourn until to-morrow.

The PRIME MINISTER

I agree.

TURNER

I wish to protest against any further adjournment. Parliament has been closed down except for a few days since August, and I think we should get on with the business.