HC Deb 01 May 1923 vol 163 cc1143-4

London, Midland, and Scottish Railway Bill [Lords] (By Order).

Order for Second Reading read.

Mr. W. THORNE

Can you, Sir, give me the reason why certain names are not attached to the Motion for the rejection of the Bill? Last night, about 7.30, I handed in a Motion for the rejection of the Bill, with about eight names attached, and only one of those names is on the Paper.

Mr. SPEAKER

Six names appear on the Paper, and only six are allowed.

Second Reading deferred till Monday next.

LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL (MONEY) BILL (Standing Orders applicable thereto complied with),

Mr. SPEAKER laid upon the Table Report from one of the Examiners of Petitions for Private Bills, That, in the case of the following Bill, referred on the First Reading thereof, the Standing Orders which are applicable thereto have been complied with, namely:

London County Council (Money) Bill. Bill to be read a Second time.

Provisional Order Bills (No Standing Orders applicable),

Mr. SPEAKER laid upon the Table Report from one of the Examiners of Petitions for Private Bills, That, in the case of the following Bill, referred on the First Reading thereof, no Standing Orders are applicable, namely:

Oyster and Mussel Fishery (Seasalter and Ham) Provisional Order Bill.

Bill to be read a Second time To-morrow.

Private Bill Petitions [Lords] (Standing Orders not complied with),

Mr. SPEAKER laid upon the Table Report from one of the Examiners of Petitions for Private Bills, That, in the case of the Petition for the following Bill, originating in the Lords, the Standing Orders have not been complied with, namely:

West Bromwich Corporation [Lords].

Report referred to the Select Committee on Standing Orders.

Greenock Corporation Bill,

As amended, considered; to be read the Third time.

Great Western Railway (Swansea Harbour Vesting) Bill [Lords] (by Order),

Read a Second time, and committed.

    c1144
  1. MARRIAGES PROVISIONAL ORDER BILL, 47 words
Back to