§ 7. Mr. R. MORRISONasked the Minister of Pensions whether an ex-service man in receipt of a pension of £2 per week for the loss of both legs 1546 amputated above the knee is entitled to an additional sum for constant attendance allowance; and, if so, what amount and upon what conditions?
§ Major TRYONIn a case of this nature the man would be eligible for a constant attendance allowance if the effects of his disablement are such as to make it necessary that he should have regular assistance from another person. Each case is considered in this light, and the amount of any allowance granted varies, within the maximum of 20s. a week, with the amount of attendance required.
§ Mr. MORRISONIn the case of a man who lost both legs in the War and has since married, is he entitled to the allowance on the ground that his wife is taking the place of the attendant who would otherwise have to be paid?
§ Major TRYONIf the wife takes the place of the attendant, she can draw the amount, but the amount of the allowance depends on the extent of the man's loss through disability.
§ Major McKENZIE WOODDoes not the right hon. Gentleman think a man who has lost both legs must in all cases require assistance, and should he not have the grant as a matter of course?
§ Mr. MACPHERSONIs it not a fact that in all cases where a man's disability is complete on account of the loss of both legs he gets full attendance allowance?
§ Major TRYONI understand that is so. I am going into the point and trying to have a change and make grants on a more permanent basis if possible.
§ Major WOODDoes not the right hon. Gentleman think the fact that a man has lost both legs means that he must require assistance?
§ Major TRYONI think that is already quite clear.
§ Mr. MORRISONIn the case of a man who lost both legs in 1917 and has not received constant attendance allowance, is he not entitled to it?
§ Major TRYONIf the hon. Member sends me the case he will be helping me.