HC Deb 22 April 1920 vol 128 cc560-1
56. Sir HENRY DALZIEL

asked the Prime Minister whether he is aware that there is a general desire among Scottish representatives that the post of Secretary for Scotland should be raised to the status of a Secretaryship of State and that the salary attached thereto should be increased to the level of such secretaryship; and what action, if any, he proposes to take in the matter?

Mr. BONAR LAW

Yes, Sir. I believe also that the view of the Scottish Members represents the general feeling in Scotland, but I do not think that it would be possible to make the suggested change in this office without dealing, at the same time, with some other Cabinet offices, and the Government cannot see their way, at present, to introduce legislation on this subject.

Sir H. DALZIEL

Will the right hon. Gentleman consent to the appointment of a Committee of unofficial Members to consider the whole question of Ministerial salaries in relation to Scotland?

Mr. BONAR LAW

If I thought there was any general feeling in the House in favour of that course, I should be glad to adopt it, but I do not think there is.

Captain REDMOND

Is it the view of Scottish Members generally that an Englishman should be appointed Secretary for Scotland?

Mr. BONAR LAW

I have not heard that view expressed.

Lieut.-Colonel MURRAY

Is there any reason why this matter should not be dealt with separately in a short Bill which could easily go through?

Mr. BONAR LAW

My hon. and gallant Friend is a Scottish Member. He is very sanguine, but he does not show in this the usual caution of his race.

Sir H. CRAIK

Would it not be possible to prevent these serious discrepancies between the salaries of various Ministers by reverting to the pooling system?

Mr. BONAR LAW

My right hon. Friend will, no doubt, be aware that when the pooling system was in force, it was subjected to a good deal of criticism.