§ 15. Mr. ROBERT YOUNGasked the Minister of Labour the number of firms in each great centre of industry who have signed the King's circular to employ their quota of disabled soldiers, and if he can state the number of disabled soldiers still unprovided for?
§ Sir M. BARLOWThe total number of establishments on the King's National Roll at present is 14,144. The names of the firms up to 31st December, 1919, are given in the first edition of the Roll, which has been published, and copies of which have been sent to hon. Members. An analysis of the Roll by centres of industry could not be made without great labour, but I am circulating in the OFFICIAL REPORT a statement showing the number of firms on the Roll for each county. The number of ex-service disabled men on the live registers of Employment Exchanges at 1st April was 25,700, as compared with 30,000 at 5th March and 39,600 at 9th January.
§ The following is the statement referred to:—
ENGLAND. | ||||
Bedfordshire | … | … | … | 132 |
Berkshire | … | … | … | 75 |
Buckinghamshire | … | … | … | 45 |
Cambridgeshire | … | … | … | 70 |
Cheshire | … | … | … | 278 |
Cornwall | … | … | … | 12 |
Cumberland | … | … | … | 47 |
Derbyshire | … | … | … | 188 |
Devonshire | … | … | … | 97 |
Dorsetshire | … | … | … | 51 |
Durham | … | … | … | 193 |
Essex | … | … | … | 334 |
Gloucestershire | … | … | … | 186 |
Hampshire | … | … | … | 130 |
Herefordshire | … | … | … | 61 |
Hertfordshire | … | … | … | 109 |
Huntingdonshire | … | … | … | 15 |
Isle of Man | … | … | … | 1 |
Isle of Wight | … | … | … | 5 |
Kent | … | … | … | 396 |
Lancashire | … | … | … | 1,830 |
Leicestershire | … | … | … | 284 |
Lincolnshire | … | … | … | 181 |
London | … | … | … | 1,806 |
Middlesex | … | … | … | 261 |
Norfolk | … | … | … | 152 |
Northamptonshire | … | … | … | 188 |
Northumberland | … | … | … | 108 |
Nottinghamshire | … | … | … | 396 |
Oxfordshire. | … | … | … | 26 |
Rutlandshire | … | … | … | 1 |
Shropshire | … | … | … | 140 |
Somersetshire | … | … | … | 102 |
Staffordshire | … | … | … | 1,359 |
Suffolk | … | … | … | 128 |
Surrey | … | … | … | 298 |
Sussex | … | … | … | 249 |
Warwickshire | … | … | … | 759 |
Westmorland. | … | … | … | 9 |
Wiltshire | … | … | … | 47 |
Worcestershire | … | … | … | 458 |
Yorkshire | … | … | … | 1,605 |
Total, England | … | … | … | 12,812 |
SCOTLAND. | ||||
Aberdeen | … | … | … | 23 |
Aberdeenshire | … | … | … | 6 |
Argyle | … | … | … | 4 |
Ayrshire | … | … | … | 30 |
Banffshire | … | … | … | 1 |
Berwickshire | … | … | … | 2 |
Caithness | … | … | … | 4 |
Clackmannon | … | … | … | 6 |
Dumfries | … | … | … | 36 |
Dundee | … | … | … | 12 |
Dumbartonshire | … | … | … | 18 |
Edinburgh | … | … | … | 306 |
Fifeshire | … | … | … | 26 |
Forfarshire | … | … | … | 39 |
Glasgow | … | … | … | 155 |
Haddington | … | … | … | 8 |
Inverness | … | … | … | 10 |
Kirkcudbright | … | … | … | 6 |
Kincardineshire | … | … | … | 1 |
Linlithgowshire | … | … | … | 3 |
Morayshire | … | … | … | 7 |
Midlothian | … | … | … | 1 |
Peebles | … | … | … | 19 |
Perthshire | … | … | … | 19 |
Orkney Isles | … | … | … | 1 |
Renfrewshire | … | … | … | 47 |
Ross-shire | … | … | … | 2 |
Roxburgh | … | … | … | 23 |
Selkirk | … | … | … | 30 |
Stirlingshire | … | … | … | 22 |
Wigtown | … | … | … | 3 |
Lanarkshire | … | … | … | 64 |
Total, Scotland | … | … | … | 934 |
WALES. | ||||
Anglesey | … | … | … | 6 |
Brecknockshire | … | … | … | 4 |
Carmarthenshire | … | … | … | 12 |
Carnarvonshire | … | … | … | 16 |
Denbighshire | … | … | … | 84 |
Flintshire | … | … | … | 18 |
Glamorganshire | … | … | … | 188 |
Merionethshire | … | … | … | 8 |
Monmouthshire | … | … | … | 40 |
Montgomeryshire | … | … | … | 15 |
Pembrokeshire | … | … | … | 6 |
Radnorshire | … | … | … | 1 |
Total, Wales | … | … | … | 398 |
§ Captain LOSEBYCan the hon. Gentleman say when the second edition of this revised Roll will be published?
§ Sir M. BARLOWI am not in a position to say when it will be published, but I understand that it is being undertaken.
§ Mr. LUNNWould the hon. Gentleman show specially in his analysis how the local authorities and Government Departments have adopted this Roll?
§ Sir M. BARLOWI am not quite certain on what basis the analysis is being prepared, but perhaps, if it does not satisfy my hon. Friends opposite, they will put a question down about it, and we will endeavour to satisfy them.
§ Captain LOSEBYWill this revised Roll be published according to towns and districts?
§ Sir M. BARLOWI was not aware that any promise had been given to that effect, but, of course, if it has been given, it will be carried out.