HC Deb 25 March 1919 vol 114 cc205-6
19. Lieutenant-Colonel WEIGALL

asked whether the Central Regimental Institutes funds have been used by the Navy and Army Canteen Board as part of the trading capital of the board; whether the board was financed by a loan of two millions sterling guaranteed by the Treasury; whether the profits accruing have been obtained from the expenditure of the 5½d. messing grant or the spending of the soldiers' private money; and what justification is there for utilising any of these profits in financial arrangements to meet changes of personnel?

Mr. FORSTER

The balance of the Central Regimental Institutes Fund, after payment of the grants made from it by the Army Council, is used by the Navy and Army Canteen Board as part of its trading capital, and interest has been credited thereon. The board have been financed by Treasury guarantee to a maximum amount of £3,000,000. The present debt is £1,600,000, which it is expected will be fully liquidated by the end of June. The profits of the organisation have been derived from both sources mentioned. The cost of the personnel is a part of the working expenses of the board, and as such is payable out of its revenue.

Colonel BURN

Will the Secretary for War be willing to receive a small deputation of officers who are interested in this matter?

Mr. CHURCHILL

That is a matter connected with my right hon. Friend's Department.

Sir F. HALL

Will the Financial Secretary receive a deputation?

Mr. FORSTER

Yes, Sir.

20. Lieutenant - Colonel WEIGALL

asked whether any decision has yet been arrived at as to the ultimate disposal of central regimental funds?

Mr. FORSTER

This matter is still under consideration.

Major Earl WINTERTON

Have any efforts been made to ascertain the wishes of officers and other ranks in this matter? Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that considerable dissatisfaction exists in regard to the somewhat arbitrary action of the Army Council in deciding to practically seize regimental funds?

Mr. FORSTER

Successful attempts have been made to ascertain the views of regimental officers and other ranks. I have no information in my possession which bears out the latter part of my Noble Friend's suggestion.

Sir F. HALL

Will the right hon. Gentleman recognise the fact that these funds have been contributed not only by regimental officers but to a greater extent by the men, and that they should be taken into consideration?