HC Deb 01 April 1919 vol 114 cc1059-60
48. Mr. HURD

asked the Prime Minister whether he is aware that the directions of the Road-Stone Control Committee (War Office), dated 17th July, 1918, operate unfairly in the case of quarry-owners; whether the cost of maintaining wagons has increased by 250 per cent., approximately, since 1914; whether railway companies, by reason of their contract with the Government, are able to meet this increased cost of repair; and whether similar consideration should be given to quarry-owners, whose wagons are also at the service of the nation?

Mr. FORSTER

My right hon. Friend has asked me to reply. I understand that, under the directions to which my hon. Friend refers, the addition to the free-on-rail price of road materials to cover delivery at destination station in privately-owned wagons must not exceed the amount which would be charged by a railway company for such conveyance if the material were carried in railway-owned wagons. I am informed, however, that the increased cost of maintenance of privately-owned wagons is taken into consideration in fixing the maximum price of quarried material, and is, in fact, treated as part of the cost of production.

Mr. HURD

Are we to understand that there is really no differentiation in the matter between the quarry owners and the railway companies?

Mr. FORSTER

I did not say that. What I said was that the addition to the price to cover delivery must not exceed, in the case of privately-owned wagons, that which is properly chargeable in the case of railway wagons.

Mr. HURD

Does that mean that there is no differentiation in the treatment of these two classes?

Mr. FORSTER

If the hon. Member has reason to think that the intention of the regulation is not carried out and gives me particulars I will inquire into it.