HC Deb 08 May 1918 vol 105 c2140
76. Mr. P. A. HARRIS

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food if he is aware that, since the price of treacle was fixed at 10d. per lb., many grocers have declined to stock it on the ground that the official price leaves insufficient profit; and if he proposes to take steps to ensure a proper distribution of an article so necessary in face of the limited supply of sugar?

Mr. CLYNES

I have no information as to any action of this kind on the part of the grocery trade, and there appears to be no foundation for the suggestion that the profit for the retailer will be inadequate. Steps have been taken to secure a proper distribution of this article.

Mr. HARRIS

Will the hon. Gentleman consider the rationing of treacle, as it is really a substitute for sugar, and fair distribution is as necessary as for sugar?

Mr. CLYNES

The reason why rationing of treacle has not been adopted is that there are many difficulties in connection with it. We are trying to arrange an equitable distribution.

Mr. TICKLER

I should be glad to give the hon. Member information—

Mr. SPEAKER

Order, order! The Lobby is the place for that.

Forward to