§ 6. Colonel McCALMONTasked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether five German prisoners of war were conveyed through London to Euston Station on 8th June in a large touring motor car; whether there was any reason why these prisoners should not either have marched or have proceeded by cab, transport wagon, underground railway, or other less luxurious conveyance, as in the case of British and Allied troops; whether he is aware of cases in which British officers proceeding from Germany as invalids to Switzerland have been refused any form of transport to railway stations at considerable distances; and whether it is intended to continue these unnecessary privileges for German prisoners of war?
§ The UNDER-SECRETARY of STATE for WAR (Mr. Macpherson)As regards the first part of the question, I am informed that five prisoners of war, two escorts, and eight other ranks were conveyed in a motor char-à-banc, there being no other vehicle available. I would explain that it is the practice to convey prisoners, travelling across London, in closed conveyances, and that usually motor ambulances or lorries are used, but on this occasion it is regretted that such vehicles could not be obtained. For obvious reasons it is not considered desirable that prisoners of war should be marched through London or conveyed by underground railway or other public conveyance.
§ Colonel McCALMONTAre German officer prisoners of war allowed joy-rides in motor cars for the sake of their health?
§ Mr. MACPHERSONI have never heard that before, but I will make inquiries if my hon. and gallant Friend will give me any case.
§ Sir H. CRAIKIs it not the case that prisoners are constantly carried through London by means other than motor chars-à-bancs?
§ Mr. MACPHERSONI am told this is the only occasion on which a motor char-à-banc has been used.
§ Sir H. CRAIKI myself have seen four.
§ Mr. MACPHERSONIf the right hon. Gentleman will give me any particulars he has, I shall inquire into them.