HC Deb 11 June 1918 vol 106 cc2022-3
9. Mr. LEES-SMITH

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War in how many cases soldiers have been tried by court-martial on the complaint of a woman that they had infected her with venereal disease?

Mr. MACPHERSON

I am sorry that I have no information, but if my hon. Friend can direct my attention to any cases where such a complaint has been lodged I will endeavour to find out what punishment, if any, has been inflicted on the soldier. The maximum punishment to which he is liable under Section 11 of the Army Act is two years' hard labour, and not six months, as the case with a woman under Regulation 40 d.

Mr. LEES-SMITH

Is it not a fact that while the right hon. Gentleman says there is no evidence of any soldier having been punished, there is already evidence of a large number of women having been punished, and that his statement that this Regulation applies equally to women and men breaks down in practice?

Mr. SPEAKER

The hon. Gentleman is making a statement in the form of a question.

Mr. CHANCELLOR

Is no record of these cases kept?

14. Mr. LEES-SMITH

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he will say how many resolutions he has received demanding the withdrawal of Regulation 40 d of the Defence of the Realm Acts?

Mr. MACPHERSON

Upwards of 300 resolutions to this effect have been received in the War Office. In many cases, however, more than one copy of the same resolution has been received, and I have no doubt that in nearly all cases the same resolutions have been sent to the Home Office.

Mr. LEES-SMITH

Is there any prospect of the War Office dealing with this matter, in view of the large number of resolutions?

Mr. MACPHERSON

The whole question has been most carefully considered, not only by the War Office, but by the War Cabinet.