§ 13. Colonel SHARMAN-CRAWFORDasked the Under-Secretary of State for War why an officer of the Old Army who retired some years ago with a small gratuity, and who afterwards came up to serve with the New Army, is thereby now deprived of two-thirds of the gratuity to which he would have been entitled if he had not previously served?
§ Mr. FORSTERThe Regulations are precise, and were in force before the War.
§ Colonel SHARMAN-CRAWFORDWill the right hon. Gentleman answer the question why an officer should be penalised for serving again by having his gratuity cut down by 50 per cent.?
§ Mr FORSTERAs I have told the hon. and gallant Gentleman that this was considered a very long time ago, after the South African War, I do not think there has been occasion to reconsider it since.