HC Deb 02 July 1918 vol 107 cc1564-5
19. Mr. GILBERT

asked the First Commissioner of Works why the statue of King Charles at Charing Cross has been sandbagged and covered with staging, and what the estimated cost of this work will be; if he will say if it is proposed to deal with other public statues in London in the same way; and, if so, how many and what statues they are?

The FIRST COMMISSIONER of WORKS (Sir A. Mond)

I would refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on the 19th June to the hon Member for Portsmouth for the reasons for this work, the estimated cost of which is £450. It is not my present intention to have any other statutes similarly treated.

Mr. PRINGLE

Will the hon. Gentleman not consider the claims of Oliver Cromwell for similar protection?

Sir A. MOND

We will consider anything reasonable.

Mr. WATT

Is it the case that this £450 was paid, not by the State but by the donor?

Mr. HOLT

May I inquire whether this particular statue has been chosen as an indication of the Government's sympathy with statesmen who lose their heads?

Sir A. MOND

The beautiful statue of the distinguished sovereign that I am protecting is one of the finest works of art in the Metropolis.

Mr. T. WILSON

Why has the right hon. Gentleman not taken the same precaution with regard to Westminster Hall?

Sir A. MOND

Because it is obviously impossible.

Mr. T. WILSON

Why?

Mr. KING

Does this £450, the estimated cost, include the corrugated-iron covering?

Sir A. MOND

It includes the entire expense.