§ 59. Sir J. D. REESasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether Mr. P. M'Dougall, Commissioner, and the six Sub-Commissioners for Live Stock in Scotland, who are with one exception of military age, are or are not performing the duties of Commissioner and Sub-Commissioner, respectively, at the present time; if they are, from what date have they been so engaged; whether the local agricultural committees concerned have been consulted as to the continuance of the exemptions they have obtained; whether such exemptions were given on the ground that their presence on their farms was essential; and will he say why such exemptions are continued now that they have found time to accept paid official appointments under Government?
§ The PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY to the MINISTRY of FOOD (Mr. Clynes)With regard to first part of the question, the hon. Member would appear to be under a misapprehension. Of the six Deputy Live Stock Commissioners for Scotland three, not five, are of military age. Mr. M'Dougall was appointed in September, and the Deputy Live Stock Commissioners in November and December, 1917. The answer to the third part of the question is in the negative, and to the fourth part in the affirmative. In regard to the last part of the question, it is considered by the Ministry of Food that in view of the importance and responsibility of the work done by Mr. M'Dougall and his Deputy-Commissioners, it is in the national 1537 interest that their exemptions should be continued, and Lord Rhondda is in communication with the Minister of National Service on the subject.
§ Sir J. D. REESDo I understand that Lord Rhondda, the Minister of Food, has decided that no other persons can be found in Scotland who are not of military age to perform these functions?
§ Mr. CLYNESMy reply states that he is in communication with the Minister of National Service on the subject.
§ Mr. PRINGLEWill that answer be communicated to the Amalgamated Society of Engineers?
§ Mr. CLYNESI see no reason for that.
§ 61. Sir J. D. REESasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether the Board of Agriculture in Scotland was originally charged with the duty of dealing with all questions affecting live stock and has on its staff men of experience in this behalf at least equal to that possessed by the Live Stock Commissioner and Sub-Commissioners of military age; and, if so, whether the last-named officers will now he released for military duty?
§ Mr. CLYNESThe Food Controller is not aware that the Scottish Board of Agriculture has at any time been charged with the duty of exercising control over the supply, distribution, and prices of live cattle arid dead meat; nor is he aware that any person on its staff has had previous experience of the special problems arising out of the necessity for fixing prices and controlling distribution. The second and third parts of the question do not, therefore, arise.
§ Sir J. D. REESFor what purpose does this body exist if it cannot deal with primary agricultural needs like this?
§ Mr. CLYNESThere are many other purposes than those stated in the question of my hon. Friend.?
§ Sir J. D. REESWhy are these exempted from their purview?
62. The HON. MEMBERasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether Mr. James Picken, Sub-Commissioner for Live Stock, South-West Area, in Scotland, was recently refused exemption by the Appeal Tribunal sitting at Dumfries; whether he has now been released for military duty or is still occu- 1538 pied as Sub-Commissioner of Live Stock; and, in the latter event, whether the Food Controller will now cancel his appointment as Sub-Commissioner?
§ Mr. CLYNESSince Mr. Picken accepted an appointment as Deputy Live Stock Commissioner for the South-West of Scotland his exemption as a farmer has been cancelled by the local tribunal. The question of his further exemption on the ground that he is necessarily engaged on work of national importance is now under discussion with the Ministry of National Service.
§ Sir J. D. REESIs it a fact that this gentleman, having been refused exemption by those who are aware of himself and his circumstances, is being held back from the Army by a Government Department?
§ Mr. CLYNESNo doubt those circumstances were taken into account in determining this case, and have been laid before the Ministry of National Service.
§ Sir J. D. REESIs the hon. Gentleman aware that his answers to-day have not given the impression of a satisfactory decision in that respect?
§ Mr. SPEAKERWe can form our own judgment.