3. Mr. PONSONBYasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether any Committee has been appointed to study the question of the reconstitution and reorganisation of the foreign services in the light of the recommendations of the Royal Commission, in order that an improved system may be introduced at the earliest possible moment?
Lord R.CECILNo such Committee has been appointed, but proposals in this direction have been made and are now under discussion with the Treasury.
§ Mr. WHYTECan the Noble Lord hold out any prospect that these proposals will be submitted to Parliament for discussion before their eventual adoption, as a policy, by the Foreign Office?
§ Lord R. CECILI do not think I can give any pledge of that kind. Of course, they will be open to discussion by the House. But it is very unusual to postpone a reform of this kind.
§ Lord R. CECILOf course, if Parliament desires, the proposals can be a discussion: it is not like the law of the Medes and Persians. But I may assure the House that I am as anxious as any hon. Member to have reform in the direction indicated by hon. Members. My seeming reluctance is due to the fact that I am afraid of delay in the matter.
§ Mr. WHYTEIf, according to the answer of the Noble Lord, he cannot postpone the inauguraton of these reforms until Debate has taken place in this House, may I ask him whether he will, at least, make public the proposals of the Foreign Office before they are finally adopted?
§ Lord R. CECILI could not possibly give a pledge of that kind, but I shall be glad to discuss the matter with my hon. Friend.
§ Mr. KINGIs not the Noble Lord aware that this Royal Commission—and its Report—is four years old, and therefore a possible delay of two or three weeks to allow the House to understand what the proposals are does not seem very unreasonable?
§ Lord R. CECILI am in the hands of the Foreign Office, and cannot promise anything. But as far as I am concerned, I am anxious to see these reforms put through at the earliest possible moment.
§ Mr. WINGAre these new arrangements concerned with purely diplomatic representatives or will there be commercial representatives amongst the Attachés?
§ Lord R. CECILThat is a separate subject: that is also being dealt with. I hope that also is in an advanced stage of preparation.
Captain G. A. LLOYDMay I ask that, at any rate, before those reforms are definitely decided upon, we shall have the opportunity of discussing the whole question in the House of Commons, if Members of the House desire it?
§ Lord R. CECILThat is a question entirely for my right hon. Friend the Leader of the House. So far as I am concerned, I have no objection to a full discussion in this House. All I do think is that it must be left to the Government, who are responsible for administrative action: that any attempt to shift it on to the shoulders of the House of Commons is bound to lead to disaster.
§ Sir H. CRAIKIs it not the ease that, constantly, administrative reorganisation has been carried through without being submitted to this House for previous discussion?
§ Lord R. CECILI should have said it was almost universal.