HC Deb 05 February 1918 vol 101 cc2098-9
91. Mr. DUNCAN MILLAR

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Shipping the tonnage which would be saved if the output of beer were reduced to 10 per cent. of the pre-war standard, as was done some time ago in Germany, or to 6 per cent. of the pre-war standard, as in the case of Austria; and the tonnage which would be saved if the further manufacture of beer and spirits in this country were prohibited during the War?

Sir L. CHIOZZA MONEY

I will first answer the question by reference to the pre-war beer output of 36,000,000 barrels. A reduction of this output to 10 per cent. means a saving of about 1,250,000 tons, dead weight, per annum; a reduction to 6 per cent. means a saving of about 1,305,000 tons; complete prohibition means a saving of about 1,385,000 tons. I will next take the saving upon the present reduced barrelage of 15,000,000. A reduction to 10 per cent. of the pre-war output would save about 440,000 tons; a reduction of 6 per cent., about 495,000 tons; complete prohibition, about 575,000 tons. As to the last figure, I may add that the economy in tonnage may be roundly expressed as the saving in employment of twenty-nine ships, each of 5,000 tons cargo capacity, making four voyages a year.

Mr. MILLAR

Will the hon. Gentleman see that those figures are brought before the War Cabinet, as we are asked to save tonnage in every possible way?

Sir L. CHIOZZA MONEY

I can only say that they have been repeatedly brought to the notice of the War Cabinet.