HC Deb 29 November 1917 vol 99 cc2227-8
87. Mr. D. WHITE

asked the Secretary to the Admiralty whether inoculation is compulsory in the Navy; whether he is aware that men declining to be inoculated have been refused shore leave for long periods, sometimes over a year; and whether this method of enforcing inoculation is authorised by the Admiralty?

Dr. MACNAMARA

Inoculation is not compulsory. Certain consequences, however, ensue from refusal on the part of any individual to be inoculated against infectious disease. In particular, such individuals would be debarred from landing in ports where there may be any danger of contracting any disease against which inoculation is regarded by the Admiralty as advisable. From what I have already said, my hon. Friend will realise that the third part of the question does not arise.

Mr. WHITE

Is the action stated in my question authorised by the authorities?

Dr. MACNAMARA

I do not know that it is sometimes for over a year. I should doubt that. But, undoubtedly, if a ship puts into a port where there is an epidemic and a man has not been inoculated, we are entitled to say he shall not go ashore. If he did, he might come back and decimate the ship's company.

Mr. WHITE

If I send my right hon. Friend particulars of this case, which I do not think comes within the statement he has just made, will he be good enough to look into it?

Dr. MACNAMARA

Certainly.

Mr. CHANCELLOR

As a matter of fact, is not every port treated as dangerous, whether disease is there or not?

Dr. MACNAMARA

I cannot say, but the common-sense practice is what I have described.