HC Deb 27 March 1917 vol 92 cc193-4
48. Mr. FRANCE

asked the Prime Minister if it is the intention of the Government to compensate those responsible for the sale of articles of food which are non-intoxicating and do not interfere with the efficiency of the nation, such as apples, bananas, milk chocolate, biscuits, etc., in view of the fact that the import or manufacture of these articles is prohibited or restricted?

Captain BATHURST

I have been asked to reply. The answer to this question is in the negative.

Mr. FRANCE

Can the hon. Gentleman say if the same treatment is to be accorded to the liquor trade as to the food trades in this respect?

Captain BATHURST

I am not in a position to anticipate, but I should like to take this opportunity of saying that we recognise the patriotic readiness of those trades which have been or are likely to be affected by restrictive measures to make the sacrifices which are demanded of them in the public interest.

Mr. FRANCE

Can the hon. Gentleman say if the food trades are to have this opportunity of showing patriotism, those engaged in the liquor trade are to be paid for their patriotism?

Captain BATHURST

I have no reason to anticipate that distinctions are going to be made.

HON. MEMBERS

They are!

Captain BATHURST

At any rate, I am not in a position to say anything more at present. I only know that in the case of foodstuffs, to which the question of the hon. Member is directed, there has been a patriotic self-sacrifice which we are ready to recognise.

Sir S. COLLINS

Is that a patriotism which stands out distinct from the general patriotism of the tradespeople throughout the country?

Captain BATHURST

No; certainly not!