HC Deb 02 April 1917 vol 92 cc885-6
16. Mr. LYNCH

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the fall of the Russian despotism will have any effect in modifying the policy of the Allies towards Greece; whether he is aware that King Constantine is in constant communication with the Kaiser; and whether, in view of the new political situation, a more energetic programme will be adopted in the Balkans?

Mr. BALFOUR

The answer to the first and second parts of the question is in the negative, and I am unable for obvious reasons to make any statement in regard to the last part.

Mr. LYNCH

Is it not a fact that the condition of Greece represents on a small scale the condition in Russia before the fall of the Czar, and that by your policy you are supporting those parties in Greece who are favourable to the German Emperor?

Mr. BALFOUR

Historical parallels are treacherous and dangerous grounds which I could not venture to traverse by way of question and answer in this House.

Mr. LYNCH

Is there not something more dangerous and treacherous—that is, a weak and cowardly foreign policy?

Mr. OUTHWAITE

With regard to the present King Constantine is there not—

Mr. SPEAKER

There are 195 questions on the Paper, and there are many hon. Members who wish to ask questions.

17. Mr. LYNCH

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether his attention has been directed to a recent interview given by M. Venizelos to the Agence Havas, in which the Greek statesman said that the Allies, in promising him support, made the express stipulation that his movement must not be anti-dynastic, and that the imposition of such a condition deprived his movement of much of its effective value, even in regard to aiding the cause of the Allies; and whether, in view of the change of regime in Russia, the Allies will still maintain the policy indicated?

Mr. BALFOUR

I have seen the interview referred to, but cannot accept the hon. Member's account of it as accurate or complete. With regard to the last part of the question, I have nothing to add to previous declarations of the policy by His Majesty's Government.

Mr. LYNCH

Is not this interview in complete accord with the statements in the Italian Chamber by Signor Boselli, the Prime Minister of Italy, that the movement of M. Venizelos must not be anti-dynastic, otherwise it would not receive the favour of the Allies?

Mr. BALFOUR

I have heard of the statement of the Italian Prime Minister, but if the hon. Gentleman wishes an answer he must give me notice of the question.

Mr. LYNCH

Will the right hon. Gentleman refer—

Mr. SPEAKER

I have called the next question.

61. Mr. KING

asked the Prime Minister whether he will now give the House full information upon the deliberations and decisions of the Rome Conference and upon the position in Greece?

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER (Mr. Bonar Law)

I am not in a position to make any statement.

Mr. LYNCH

Should not we have the light on these important questions? Why should the House of Commons not be informed on a question connected with a policy which has been adopted?

Mr. BONAR LAW

This is one of the questions which in time of war it is necessary to keep secret.

Mr. PEMBERTON BILLING

Shall we have an opportunity of discussing this in Secret Session?