HC Deb 27 June 1916 vol 83 c735
38. Mr. MacCALLUM SCOTT

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with regard to the Treasury payments to the clergy of the Established Church of Scotland on l5th May and on 29th September, whether the payment on 29th September represents the sum due for the half-year ending on the Scottish term of Martinmas, 11th November; and, if so, whether any steps are taken to prevent misunderstanding on this subject at the time of paying?

Mr. McKENNA

I would refer my hon. Friend to Section 11 of the Act 60, Geo. III., cap. 84, which provides that the sums in question "shall be payable by two half-yearly payments at the terms of Whitsunday and Michaelmas in each year." There is no mention of Martinmas. The forms of receipt signed by the ministers to whom payment is made each September are in respect of payment "for the half-year to Michaelmas"

Mr. MacCALLUM SCOTT

Are these, in fact, half-years, or are they not half-years?

Mr. McKENNA

I think substantially they are half-years.

Mr. MacCALLUM SCOTT

Six months?

Mr. McKENNA

Substantially six months.

Mr. MacCALLUM SCOTT

Does that mean five months?