HC Deb 17 August 1916 vol 85 cc2043-4
23. Mr. MacCALLUM SCOTT

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, if he is satisfied that novo-caine is an effective substitute for cocaine, he will make his restrictions with regard to the supply of cocaine apply equally to all dentists, registered as well as unregistered?

The SECRETARY Of STATE for the HOME DEPARTMENT (Mr. Herbert Samuel)

I see no grounds, as at present advised, for applying the restrictions to practitioners duly registered under the Dentists Act. I would point out also that if registered dentists were prevented from using cocaine, the supply of novo-caine for the unregistered would be made more difficult.

Mr. SCOTT

Is there any reason why restrictions should apply to unregistered and not to registered dentists?

Mr. SAMUEL

Yes, because registered dentists are persons who are registered to receive cocaine, and unregistered dentists are not registered.

Mr. SCOTT

Is it the case that they have not a list of unregistered dentists, and cannot get a list of those to whom cocaine is supplied?

Mr. SAMUEL

Any person could call himself an unregistered dentist.