HC Deb 05 May 1915 vol 71 cc1093-4
14. Mr. GINNELL

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War what publications have been suppressed under the Defence of the Realm Act and what publications otherwise interfered with under the Act have ceased to exist?

Mr. TENNANT

It would not be in the public interest to amplify the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary for Ireland to the hon. Member on this subject on the 8th February last. Since that date one further seizure of a newspaper has been made on the grounds that it contained statements likely to cause disaffection or to prejudice recruiting.

Mr. GINNELL

Will the right hon. Gentleman say how many publications have been suppressed?

Mr. TENNANT

I only know of one newspaper.

Mr. GINNELL

The question asked is, How many separate publications have been suppressed? Is it the opinion of the Government, or of the right hon. Gentleman, that this House has no right, or interest, in the freedom of public opinion?

Mr. DEPUTY-SPEAKER

That is a matter of argument.

Mr. LYNCH

May I ask if any one of these papers has been suppressed, and whether it does contravene any of these laws?

Mr. TENNANT

My information is that one newspaper has been suppressed because it contained statements likely to cause disaffection or to prejudice recruiting; and I am quite sure the hon. Gentleman would be the first to wish the War Office to take steps to suppress a newspaper in those circumstances.

Mr. GINNELL

Will the right hon. Gentleman say why those papers had not been put on trial of some sort?

Mr. TENNANT

It is not considered desirablep—

Mr. GINNELL

Desirable by whom?

Mr. TENNANT

Nor do the terms of the Defence of the Realm Act and the Regulations issued under it require a trial.

Mr. LYNCH

was understood to say: I will raise the question later on.