§ Order for Second Reading read.
§ Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Bill be now read a second time."
§ Mr. HOGGEIs it possible to get a copy of this Bill? I asked at the Vote Office, and it does not seem to be printed.
§ Mr. MONTAGUI think that the Bill ought to be in the Vote Office. I am very sorry if my hon. Friend has been inconvenienced, but I think that the Bill is in exactly the same terms in every detail as the corresponding Bill of last year.
§ Sir F. BANBURYI did not know that it had not been printed. I venture to suggest that it is irregular to take a Bill which has not been printed. It has never been the custom to do so since I have been a Member of the House.
§ Mr. MONTAGUI have had among my papers all the afternoon a copy of the Bill. I thought that the rule to which the hon. Baronet refers was not so applicable in the case of a Bill introduced regularly every Session in the same terms. If the hon. Baronet persists, the Bill can be postponed.
§ Mr. L. JONESIf the Bill has not been printed and is identical with the Bill of last year, I would suggest that we should alter the date and save the cost of reprinting it.
§ Sir F. BANBURYWe had better carry out the old rule.
§ Mr. MONTAGUVery well.
§ Motion made, and Question, "That the Debate be now adjourned,"—[Sir Frederick Banbury,]—put, and agreed to.
§ Debate to be resumed upon Monday next.