§ 51. Mr. HOGGEasked whether the new separation allowances in the case of London are increased by 3s. 6d. a week?
§ 52. Mr. HOGGEasked the Under-Secretary of State for War, whether he will consider paying in full the amount of dependence in all separation allowances without any deduction from the soldier's pay?
§ 67. Mr. KEIR HARDIEasked the Financial Secretary to the War Office whether his attention has been drawn to the irregularities in the allowances made to dependants of soldiers other than wives; whether much of this is due to the varying sums calculated to have been given by a soldier to his dependant before enlisting; and whether he is prepared to recommend that this grievance be abolished by the substitution of an universal value for pre-enlisting dependence and thus remove what is at present a cause of hardship to many dependants and of much work to the pension officers?
Mr. BAKERI would remind the hon. Members that these matters were before the Select Committee and that the Government has finally accepted the Committee's recommendations.
§ Mr. HOGGEWill my hon. Friend make it quite clear in any future statement he makes that the soldier himself contributes the allotment which the Government allege they give as a separation allowance?
§ Mr. KEIR HARDIEWill my suggestion as to the substitution of a universal value be the basis?
§ Mr. KEIR HARDIEWhen may we expect a decision?
§ 63. Mr. HOGGEasked whether, when a soldier has his pay stopped for default, his dependants also lose their separation allowance for that period; and, if so, whether the War Office will consider the advisability of punishing the soldier only and not his dependants?
Mr. BAKERIt has been decided that separation allowance in these cases shall continue so long as the soldier remains in the Army.