§ 56. Mr. HUNTasked the Secretary for War whether, if not already the case, he will consider the advantage of putting at least one non-commissioned officer on the Committee to be appointed on the question of canteens in the Army?
§ The PRIME MINISTERThere are already four representatives of the Army on the Committee referred to, and I have received no representation in the sense of the question. I think that the best interests of all ranks are adequately represented.
§ Mr. HUNTIs it not the fact that the canteens are for the non-commissioned officers and men, and could not they be given one representative to put forward their views?
§ The PRIME MINISTERThat might lead to a great deal—we might have a noncommissioned officer and a private. I believe the Committee is well satisfied as it is to look after the interests of the Army.
§ Mr. HUNTWhat is the right hon. Gentleman's objection to having a non-commissioned officer or a private, both as respectable and democratic as anybody?
§ Sir J. D. REESHas the right hon. Gentleman considered whether a small private trader should not be appointed?
§ The PRIME MINISTERThere is one already.
§ Sir J. D. REESMay I ask who it is?