HC Deb 12 June 1913 vol 53 cc1773-4
45. Mr. LYNCH

asked the Prime Minister whether, in view of the opinion widely held that the establishment of the office of Poet Laureate has been of advantage neither to the nation nor to literature, he will consider the advisability of abolishing that office?

The PRIME MINISTER (Mr. Asquith)

The question is being considered in all its aspects.

46. Mr. LYNCH

asked whether the Prime Minister can state the salary, perquisites, and privileges appertaining to the office of Poet Laureate, and also the exact nature of the duties; whether the Poet Laureate is bound to produce a certain quantity of verse per annum; and whether he will have printed as a White Paper the productions in verse of the Laureates for the last 150 years?

The PRIME MINISTER

The salary is now £70 a year with an allowance of £27 in lieu of a butt of sack. I do not know that the duties of a Poet Laureate are exactly defined. I am not prepared to accede to the request contained in the last part of the question. Most of the productions referred to can be obtained by those who desire to peruse them.

Mr. SWIFT MacNEILL

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the position of Poet Laureate was established in substitution for the old, ancient, and time-honoured institution of the King's jester, and that the salary is exactly that which was given the King's jester? Will the right hon. Gentleman now re-establish the office of the King's jester?

The PRIME MINISTER

This time, I think my hon. Friend's history is not quite right.

Mr. CROFT

Will the right hon. Gentleman consider the claim of the hon. Member for Donegal?

Mr. JAMES HOPE

Has the Poet Laureate the option to claim a butt of sack or £27?

The PRIME MINISTER

That was commuted nearly one hundred years ago.

Mr. LYNCH

Is there not an intolerable deal of sack for a ha'porth of poetry?