HC Deb 22 January 1913 vol 47 cc392-4
13 Mr. ALAN SYKES

asked the Secretary for War (1) whether the equipment of the Regular Infantry includes packs, while that of the Territorials does not; and, if so, what are the reasons for making this distinction in equipment; (2) whether, in equipment regulations of the Army, Territorial Force, he will include packs in the articles enumerated in Table 2, Accoutrements (V.), Infantry; and (3) whether he is aware that the military officer responsible reported, in the ease of the 6th battalion, Cheshire Regiment, that a pack is required to complete the equipment in possession of this unit, and that he made a similar report in the case of the 5th battalion of the Cheshire Regiment; and if he will explain how the commanding officers of these battalions are to obtain packs, in view of the fact that packs are not authorised by the equipment regulations?

The SECRETARY of STATE for WAR (Colonel Seely)

The equipment of Regular Infantry includes packs. The type of pattern of accoutrements by Territorial Force units is left to the discretion of county associations provided that the equipment is suitable and can carry at least 100 rounds of ball ammunition. Some associations have provided similar equipment to that of the Regular Infantry. The pack is not considered essential and is not therefore included in the articles enumerated in the table of accoutrements mentioned. It is understood that certain inspecting officers recommended the use of the pack, but the question of adoption rests with the county association concerned.

Mr. ALAN SYKES

If it is essential for the Regulars, is it not equally essential for the Territorials? Are not both forces prepared to go to war?

Colonel SEELY

I should have thought the hon. Member would have seen the distinction between the two forces. The tasks required of them are different.

Mr. ALAN SYKES

Does the right hon. Gentleman mean to say the Territorials do not need them?

Colonel SEELY

The two forces are designed for different purposes. The Territorial Force is primarily designed for home defence, while the Regulars are designed for service abroad. Consequently, the equipment in each case is necessarily different.

Mr. ALAN SYKES

But are not both—

Mr. SPEAKER

The hon. Member cannot argue the question now.