HC Deb 17 April 1913 vol 51 cc2130-1
101. Mr. CHARLES BATHURST

asked whether the Government have contracted with any of the vendors of land in Wiltshire required for the purposes of their new flying ground not to charge him Increment Value Duty in consequence of the sale of such land to the Government at a profit of £20,000; and, if so, what is the reason for the exoneration of such vendor from a tax imposed by the Government upon other citizens?

Mr. HAROLD BAKER

No such contract was made.

102. Mr. CHARLES BATHURST

asked what was the price per acre paid, respectively, by the War Office to Lord St. Aldwyn for his property at Netheravon and Fittleton, in the county of Wilts, and more recently by the same Government Department for their flying ground, to St. Katherine's Hospital, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, and Mr. Maton for their respective estates in parishes adjoining the above; and whether the first-mentiond proprty included less hill land and more buildings than either of the other three estates?

Mr. HAROLD BAKER

The prices per acre were approximately as follows:—

£ s.
Lord St. Alwyn 12 0
Mr. Maton 26 10
Ecclesiastical Commissioners 13 10
St. Katherine's Hospital 15 10

The first-mentioned property included a greater proportion of buildings, including cottages, than the other estates. The proportion of arable to grass land were as follows: Lord St. Alwyn, 4,302 acres arable to 3,516 acres grass; Mr. Maton, rather more than half arable; Ecclesiastical Commissioners, mostly arable; St. Katherine's Hospital, about half arable.

Mr. BATHURST

Will the hon. Gentleman admit that the statement made as regards Lord St. Aldwyn's land before the Marconi Committee to the effect that he was overpaid is not justified on those figures?

Mr. BAKER

The hon. Member realises that the lands are different lands, and that there may be a great difference in price.

Mr. KING

Do not these figures show that the Liberal Government is far more generous to the landlords than the Conservatives?