§ All sums granted by this Act and the other Act mentioned in Schedule (A) annexed to this Act out of the said Consolidated Fund towards making good the Supply granted to His Majesty, amounting, as appears by the said Schedule, in 2530 the aggregate, to the sum of one hundred and fifty-two million one hundred and sixty thousand five hundred and sixty pounds, are appropriated, and shall be deemed to have been appropriated as from the date of the passing of the Acts mentioned in the said Schedule (A), for the services and purposes expressed in Schedule (B) annexed hereto.
§ The abstract of Schedules and Schedules annexed hereto, with the notes (if any) to such Schedules, shall be deemed to be part of this Act in the same manner as if they had been contained in the body thereof.
§ In addition to the sums hereby granted out of the Consolidated Fund, there may be applied out of any money directed under Section 2 of the Public Accounts and Charges Act, 1891, to be applied as appropriations in aid of the Grants for the services and purposes specified in Schedule (B) annexed hereto, the sums respectively set forth in the last column of the said Schedule.
§ Mr. FELLThe sum of £152,160,560 includes the sum for the payment of Members of this House. I had proposed to move a reduction of the sum by £362,000. Shall I be in order in doing so?
§ Mr. JOHN WARDWill it be possible? for me to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer who are the nine Members of the House who have declined—
§ The CHAIRMANThe hon. Member must do that, if he wants to, at Question Time.
§ The CHAIRMANIf the hon. Member had been in the House earlier, he would have heard it.
§ Sir WILLIAM BYLESI understood that we had a promise from the Government that we should be allowed to discuss this year and every year—
§ The CHAIRMANThat is not a matter which can be discussed on this Bill. The hon. Member must take the proper opportunity for that.
§ Sir W. P. BYLESIs it possible to avoid a discussion by slipping this into the Bill?
§ The CHAIRMANI could not allow an answer to that question, and obviously, therefore, I cannot allow the question.
§ Mr. T. M. HEALYMay I ask why no Vote in Supply has been made the foundation for this present amount? My recollection is that there was not a Vote in Supply for Members' salaries.
§ Mr. LLOYD GEORGEThere was.
§ Mr. T. M. HEALYThis year?
§ Mr. LLOYD GEORGECertainly.
§ Mr. FELLI asked the Prime Minister when we could discuss this question, and he replied, "On the Appropriation Bill." I quite agree it should properly have come when it was moved in Supply, and I was prepared then to do so, but it was closured.
§ The CHAIRMANIt may be raised on the Third Reading.
§ Mr. T. M. HEALYWould it make a difference in your ruling if you were made aware that the Government had promised facilities for discussion on this topic, and that it was guillotined?
§ The CHAIRMANIt is a matter of policy.
§ The CHAIRMANYes. On that stage any matter which comes up in Supply is open for discussion.
§ Lord ROBERT CECILIf we cannot discuss it now I presume we shall be perfectly in order to vote against the Clause or against Schedule B in order to emphasise our disapproval of the course the Government has taken?
§ The CHAIRMANHon. Members are certainly at liberty to vote against the Clause or the Schedule.
§ Clauses 4, 5, 6 and 7, and Schedule A agreed to.
§ Question put, "That Schedule B stand part of the Bill."
§ Viscount HELMSLEY (seated and covered)Are you going to put Schedule (B), Part I. and Part II. separately?
§ The CHAIRMANNo.
§ Viscount HELMSLEYMay I point out that they are quite separate questions?
§ The CHAIRMANI cannot put the two parts of the Schedule separately.
§ Bill reported, without Amendment; to be read the third time upon Monday next (5th August).