§ Mr. KELLAWAYasked when the House will have an opportunity of discussing the use of the military in connection with the recent railway strikes?
§ The PRIME MINISTERI cannot promise more at present than to give a day for the discussion of the Report of the Railway Commission.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYIs my right hon. Friend aware that on the only occasion when the subject was discussed or mentioned in the House he then said that the Government had no desire to burke the fullest and freest discussion, but that that was a moment when the fewer words said the better; and, under these circumstances, does he feel that a subject of this importance, in which the executive action of the Government have had such tragic consequences, has been adequately and fully discussed?
§ The PRIME MINISTERMy appeal, I think, was not altogether responded to. There was a long debate on the subject. All I can say is that I cannot promise more than a day at present, but I will consider any general representations that may be made.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYIs it fair to punish these Members who responded to the appeal for the offence of those who did not?
§ The PRIME MINISTERNo, Sir; it is not.
§ Sir W. BYLESAre we to be allowed, in discussing the Report of the Railway Commission, to discuss the use of the military in civil disturbances?
§ The PRIME MINISTERThat will be a matter for the Chairman.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYasked the Under-Secretary of State for War if he is now in a position to state the charge thrown upon the Exchequer by the use of the military in connection with the recent railway strike?
§ The UNDER-SECRETARY of STATE for WAR (Colonel Seely)Returns of the extra expenditure involved have been called for, but it will be very difficult to determine accurately the extra cost caused by the use of the military.
§ Mr. WATTDoes the right hon. Gentleman propose to ask the railway companies to subscribe towards the expenses incurred?
§ Colonel SEELYNo, Sir.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYIs the right hon. Gentleman in a position to say whether the Government paid to the railway companies any charges for carrying troops on their lines?
§ Colonel SEELYThere is a question which was postponed until to-morrow in which the whole question is dealt with, addressed to the Chancellor of the Exchequer (No. 57), and perhaps the hon. Member would wait until then.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYIf the information the Government have got is not of a kind to give an accurate idea of the total cost of the military, of what use is it going to be when it is given to-morrow?
§ Colonel SEELYThe question which my hon. Friend asked was who is to pay, and the question he now asks is how much it is to cost. It is obviously difficult to estimate the cost of troops when, if not engaged on that duty, they would probably be otherwise engaged in training. The question as to who is to pay will be answered to-morrow by the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYShall we have information giving any indication of what the use of the military cost the taxpayers of the country?
§ Colonel SEELYI said that we had asked for a return, and I have also told my hon. Friend that it is difficult to estimate the cost, because we have to take into account what a soldier costs when engaged on other duties.
§ Mr. WALTER ROCHWill the additional expense form the subject of a Supplementary Estimate?
§ Colonel SEELYI think it would be more suitable if that question also were put to the Chancellor of the Exchequer to-morrow.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYasked how many persons were killed or injured by the military in connection with the recent railway strike?
§ Colonel SEELYTwo persons were killed in Wales in connection with the railway strike. There were also two deaths at Liverpool, but those were not immediately connected with the railway strike. There is no information at the War Office to enable me to state the number of those injured in England and Wales. We have received no reports of casualties in Scotland, and from Ireland I have received official information that no collision of any kind occurred between the troops and the civil population.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYWere the War Department officially represented at the inquest? Was a report taken of the evidence?
§ Colonel SEELYOn what occasion?
§ Mr. KELLAWAYAt Llanelly and at Liverpool?
§ Colonel SEELYI cannot answer that off-hand.
§ Mr. KELLAWAYI will put down a question.