HC Deb 28 March 1911 vol 23 c1134
Mr. BURGOYNE

asked why, since the sum taken for each unit was practically double the amount allotted to the "King George V." and "Centurion," the armoured vessels to be built at Devonport and Portsmouth under the Estimates of 1911–12 were not to be laid down until the end of December, 1911, or January, 1912?

Dr. MACNAMARA

The provision included in the Estimates for 1910–11 for the "King George V." and "Centurion" was made on the basis of these vessels being laid down on 31st January, 1911. The provision for the two dockyard vessels of the year 1911–12 is on the basis of their being laid down in December, 1911. The hon. Gentleman will therefore understand that it will be possible for us to spend more within the financial year upon these two last-named vessels than upon the vessels to which he refers belonging to the 1910–11 programme.

Mr. BURGOYNE

If the "King George V." and "Centurion" were laid down on 16th January, a fortnight in advance of the advertised time, has additional financial provision been made?

Dr. MACNAMARA

I cannot answer that off-hand.