HC Deb 14 March 1911 vol 22 cc2037-8

Resolutions reported from the Select Committee:—

"That, in the case of the Greater London Railway Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that Clauses 76, 77, 78, 79, and 80 are struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

"That in the case of the Upper Medway Conservancy Bill, Petition for dispensing with Standing Order 128 in the case of the Petition of 'Charles Remington Mills' against the Bill, the said Standing Order ought to be dispensed with."

"That in the case of the Belfast Corporation, Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that Tramway No. 6 is omitted from the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

"That, in the case of the Metropolitan Electric Tramways, Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that Tramways Nos. 1 and 2 are struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

"That, in the case of the Rotherham Corporation Bill, Petition for Additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to insert the Additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."

"That, in the case of the London County Council (Tramways and Improvements), Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that Tramways Nos. 2, 3, 3A, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 12A, 13, 13A, 14, 14A, and 14B are struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

"That, in the case of the Barry Railway [Lords], Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that so much of Clause 59 as relates to the extension of the time now limited for the compulsory purchase of lands required for the purposes of the railways and works described in and authorised by the Barry Railway Act of 1907 is struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

"That, in the case of the Swansea Gas [Lords], Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, if the powers with regard to the proposed tramway are struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

"That, in the case of the Bedwellty Urban District Council [Lords], Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that Parts II., III., and IV., and so much of Parts VII. and VIII. and of the First and Second Schedules as relates to the supply of water and gas are struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

Resolutions agreed to.

Report to lie upon the Table.