§ Mr. PRETYMANasked if the original valuation and the revised valuation in the Scottish case stated by Mr. Holmes Ivory applied to different areas; and, if so, what the difference was?
§ Mr. ILLINGWORTHThe original valuation was in respect of a net area of about 586 square yards, and the amended valuation of about 655 square yards. The inclusion of the additional area which had been formerly excluded changed the character of the site, and secured the permanency of lights for the main building.
§ Mr. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAINIs the hon. Gentleman aware that Mr. Holmes Ivory denies that there was any alteration of the area of the site between the first and second valuations?
§ Mr. ILLINGWORTHNo. I have given this reply which was prepared after inquiry.
§ Mr. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAINHas inquiry been made since the Debate?
§ Mr. ILLINGWORTHSo I understand.