Mr. TYSON WILSONasked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether he is aware that the decision of the Admiralty that the firm of Armstrong, Whitworth, and Company, Openshaw, Manchester, is observing the Fair-Wage Clause is causing dissatisfaction to the workmen concerned, in whose opinion the firm is guilty of a breach of the clause; whether he is aware that in the investigations that were made no approach was made to the men's re presentatives to hear their point of view; and whether, in view of the fact that this firm is being continually complained about for alleged violation of the Fair-Wage Clause, he will have this particular case referred to the advisory committee for consideration?
§ The FIRST LORD of the ADMIRALTY (Mr. McKenna)With regard to the first part of the question the Admiralty undertook a very complete and impartial investigation into the system and wages prevailing for the class of work in question' in the district, and are satisfied that a 1595 correct conclusion has been arrived at. As to the second part, the men's case was fully stated in correspondence and at a personal interview with the investigating officer as far back as February, 1910, and the most careful consideration was given by the Admiralty to all the points urged on the men's side. In August, 1910, an opportunity was afforded to the trade society to bring forward any fresh evidence, but no such evidence has been furnished. A recent visit of a second inspecting officer showed no reason for differing from the previous conclusion. With regard to the last part of the question, the case being one of simple fact and not of general principle or affecting any other department, no necessity is seen for reference to the advisory committee.
§ Mr. CHARLES DUNCANWas any inquiry made into the rate of wages paid to unskilled labourers?
§ Mr. McKENNAI do not think that arises directly out of the question. Will the hon. Member give me notice?